Article Menu

View / Download pdf version of this article

If the history of allergy is not definitive, the starting point is to consider whether the details of the reported allergic event give whatever clues as to the truthful nature of the reaction:

  • Was it an allergy, an adverse issue or an intolerance (run across below)?
  • Could the symptoms accept been caused past the illness, another medicine (including medicine interaction) or other gene rather than the antibiotic?
  • Has the patient subsequently tolerated the same or a similar antibody?

The answers to these questions volition help in the risk-do good analysis of whether the antibiotic can be prescribed once again.

Allergy is an immunological reaction (IgE-mediated hypersensitivity) to a medicine. Information technology is when the immune organisation produces an exaggerated or inappropriate response that does non unremarkably in occur in most other people.1 It can exist severe, is usually reproducible and may likewise occur with other structurally related medicines.2 Allergies tin can attenuate over time or may persist for a lifetime. Symptoms and signs are ordinarily rapid in onset, i.east. within one to 2 hours of taking the medicine, and include:3

  • Urticaria
  • Angioedema
  • Bronchospasm
  • Anaphylaxis

Delayed immune reactions can occur several days after antibody treatment is begun, and are by and large mediated past T-cells (IgG-mediated).3, four Macular, papular or morbilliform rash is a common case of a delayed reaction to antibiotics, and information technology is frequently hard to tell whether this rash is caused by the infection or the handling.3 Delayed reactions to antibiotics (particularly amoxicillin) are more often seen in patients with intercurrent infections of Epstein-Barr virus or HIV.3 Patients will ordinarily non feel the reaction again if re-exposed to the antibiotic when well.3

More than serious delayed immune reactions more often than not involve rash in conjunction with systemic symptoms, including:3

  • Serum sickness-like reaction – onset several days later handling and characterised by vasculitic rash, arthralgia, flu-like symptoms and sometimes proteinuria. This is nearly commonly seen in patients taking cephalosporins, especially cefaclor, and sulfonamides.
  • Stevens-Johnson syndrome – a class of toxic epidermal necrolysis, characterised past a red-purple rash and blistering of skin and mucous membranes. This is most commonly associated with the use of sulfonamides.
  • Hygienic meningitis – tin can exist induced with utilise of antibiotics such equally trimethoprim or co-trimoxazole. The exact mechanism for this reaction is unknown.

Adverse effects are the undesirable but predictable symptoms and signs associated with the pharmacological activeness of a medicine, due east.g. diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting with amoxicillin, Clostridium difficile infection as the cause of mail-antibiotic diarrhoea.2

Intolerance is a sensitivity reaction to a medicine that does not involve the allowed system. It is dependent on both the pharmacological action of the medicine and patient susceptibility factors.ii Information technology can be loosely defined as an unusually depression threshold for experiencing the adverse effects of a medicine or an exaggerated expression of the adverse effects of a medicine, e.thou. severe diarrhoea resulting in colitis with amoxicillin.2 Intolerance tin as well be characterised by the development of an adverse issue that is not usually associated with that medicine, e.chiliad. tinnitus with amoxicillin.2

Viral infection is a mutual cause of rash, particularly in children, eastward.g. roseola infantum.iii Rash caused past viral infection is often mistaken for an allergic reaction to antibiotics, e.g. in a patient given an antibody for an infection that is subsequently establish to be viral rather than bacterial.

Who is most susceptible to antibody allergy?

Allergy to an antibody occurs after a person has had an initial exposure (which can include in utero exposure) and has become sensitised. Therefore prior tolerance of an antibody does not provide prove that a person is not allergic.ii Once a person has had a clinically meaning IgE-mediated allergic reaction to an antibiotic, eastward.g. urticarial rash, information technology is likely, simply not inevitable, that upon re-exposure to the antibody they volition experience this reaction again, and in some cases the reaction volition exist more than severe, e.g. anaphylaxis.2 Information technology has been estimated that upward to 60% of patients with confirmed penicillin allergy volition accept an allergic reaction if re-exposed to penicillin, however, estimates vary considerably.4

Penicillin is the near frequent antibody class allergy (and penicillin M [benzylpenicillin] the almost frequent allergy among penicillins), followed past sulfonamides and tetracylines.three, four Most people who report a "penicillin allergy" will not accept a true allergy.5 In the United States, it is estimated that 8% of patients have a penicillin allergy noted in their clinical tape.5 However, less than i in 20 of these people have a clinically significant IgE-mediated reaction on oral re-challenge of penicillin.v It is estimated that anaphylaxis occurs in one to iv people per 10 000 courses of penicillin, and ten% of these anaphylactic reactions are fatal.3

Parenteral administration of an antibody is associated with a college risk of allergic reaction than oral administration. Allergy to antibiotics almost normally occurs between age 20 – 49 years.3 Beta-lactam antibiotic allergy is reported twice as oft in females than in males,5 although this may be explained past higher antibiotic use by females in this historic period grouping. It is uncertain whether a history of atopy or a family unit history of antibiotic allergy increases a person's take chances of antibiotic allergy. A small report analysed gamble factors in 62 patients who attended allergy clinics in the The states, of whom 23 had documented penicillin allergy and 39 were historic period, gender and ethnicity matched controls who had tolerated penicillin. Multivariate assay showed that a history of penicillin allergy in a first-degree relative and a history of allergy to other medicines were significant run a risk factors for penicillin allergy. Penicillin allergy was associated with a history of atopy, but this was not statistically meaning in the multivariate model.6 Limitations of this study included the sample size and whether patients attending an allergy clinic were a representative population. Further research is needed in this expanse to provide definitive answers.

Can you lot test for an antibody allergy?

If a patient has a convincing history of an allergic reaction to an antibiotic, there is no need for laboratory investigation; allergy is established and laboratory confirmation of this would not change direction.

If the patient has an uncertain history, it is in theory possible to test for antibiotic allergy, nevertheless, testing is non available for all antibiotics and when information technology is available, results demand to exist interpreted accordingly.

Blood tests for serum specific IgE (Eastward/RAST) to penicillin can be requested by any primary care practitioner. Virtually patients who are allergic to penicillin are non allergic to the whole molecule; instead, their reaction is to deposition products of penicillin jump to self-carrier proteins.iii Serum specific IgE testing to penicillin includes the major antigens but does not include the "small determinants". A positive result is therefore useful but a negative result does non exclude a significant allergy, and sensitivity may be as low every bit 45%.7 Peel prick and intradermal testing to penicillin, which includes the major and minor determinants, is a specialist process, just offered at certain hospitals. The negative predictive value of this test is very high, with no serious reactions reported in patients who were negative on testing who and so underwent penicillin challenge. Some hospitals volition perform supervised antibiotic challenges on all patients with negative skin prick or intradermal tests.

Some providers may offer skin prick or intradermal testing for cephalosporin allergy. Testing for other antibiotics is not usually available.

If laboratory testing for antibiotic allergy is existence considered, it is strongly recommended to discuss an appropriate arroyo to testing with the local laboratory or relevant specialist.

Can antibiotics be safely administered after an adverse reaction?

If the patient has a history of an acute IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction after taking an antibody, it tin be assumed that this reaction is likely to occur again on re-exposure.2 Deliberate re-exposure to the antibody is not recommended unless the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks. In about cases alternative classes of antibiotics volition be bachelor and can exist used instead. Desensitisation protocols tin be carried out under specialist supervision in a infirmary setting to induce temporary tolerance to an antibiotic if it is required for treating a serious infection, eastward.g. neurosyphilis in a patient with penicillin allergy.

People with an allergy to i antibiotic may react to structurally like antibiotics. Information technology is sometimes possible to predict cross-reactivity on the ground of the structure of the drug and, if known, what the person is specifically allergic to, e.g. people with penicillin allergy have a unlike likelihood of cross-reactivity if their reaction is due to sensitisation on the side chain of one specific penicillin than if their reaction is due to the mutual beta lactam ring.7 This is best discussed with an allergy specialist. Cross-reactivity to cephalosporins in patients allergic to penicillin does occur, but information technology is thought that this risk is very low.4 Carbapenems are normally tolerated by people who are allergic to penicillin, but are rarely used exterior the hospital setting.

If the patient has a history of a delayed hypersensitivity reaction after taking an antibody, re-challenge may exist possible, depending on the nature of the reaction.iii Delayed rashes, in item following the utilise of aminopenicillins (e.g. amoxicillin), are common and the subsequent apply of beta lactam antibiotics is not necessarily contraindicated in these patients, although the rash may reoccur.3 Re-exposure to the antibiotic is not recommended if the patient has experienced a severe delayed reaction, e.g. serum sickness-like reaction, drug-rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (Clothes) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome.3

Any agin reactions to an antibiotic should be reported to the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM), which will ensure that a warning is placed on the patients NHI record. Patients with an IgE-mediated drug allergy or a serious non-IgE-mediated reaction should exist encouraged to wear a medic alert emblem.

If the patient has a history of intolerance or agin effects after taking an antibiotic, information technology depends on the nature of the symptoms or signs equally to whether this is a contraindication for taking the medicine in the futurity. Patients who have experienced a serious adverse effect after taking an antibiotic, e.g. cholestatic jaundice later on taking amoxicillin clavulanate, are unlikely to exist willing to chance experiencing this effect again. Conversely, the benefits of handling with a item antibiotic (and lack of availability of other suitable options) may outweigh the risk of recurrence of adverse effects in patients who have experienced less severe adverse effects, e.thousand. airsickness and diarrhoea with an antibiotic.

What does a "sulfa allergy" really mean?

Patients commonly report, or are labelled with, an allergy to sulfa drugs, which can cause difficulty for clinicians making prescribing decisions, and unnecessary anxiety for patients. Uncertainty almost how this relates to the risks of other medicines or foods that contain sulfur may lead to a patient existence unnecessarily deprived of some treatment options for other conditions, east.thousand. congestive centre failure or diabetes.

Information technology is estimated that agin reactions to sulfonamide antibiotics occur in 3–6 % of handling courses, although but a small proportion of these reactions are immune-mediated allergy.viii People with HIV and AIDS are reported to have a higher incidence of hypersensitivity reactions with sulfonamide antibiotics.8 Cross-reactivity betwixt sulfonamide antibiotics and other drugs that contain sulfur is thought to be unlikely, as the chemical structure of the sulfonamide is different to the sulfur structures nowadays in other medicines (sulfhydryls in penicillamine and captopril, sulfate salts of morphine, heparin and ferrous atomic number 26) and products (sulfates in soaps and cosmetics, sulfite preservatives in foods) and other sulfonamide medicines (thiazide diuretics which practise non contain the arylamine chemic group). However, people who have experienced an allergic reaction to any antibiotic are at college risk of reacting to a sulfonamide antibiotic.viii

Information technology is therefore useful, when possible, to reconsider the ground of a "sulfa allergy" diagnosis using the principles discussed in this article: is the reaction a non-immune related intolerance or agin effect, a delayed immune reaction (T-cells-mediated), or an allergy (IgE-related hypersensitivity)?

Specifying which particular medicine is implicated in a "sulfa" (or whatsoever other) allergy in the patient record, and educating the patient about this, will assist in providing them with the best available treatment for infections, and other conditions.

For further information, see: "Advisable employ of sulfonamide antibiotics", BPJ 49 (December, 2012)

Acknowledgement

Give thanks yous to Dr Miriam Hurst, Clinical Immunologist/Immunopathologist, Labtests Auckland for expert review of this article.

References

  1. American Higher of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI). Allergy and immunology glossary. ACAAI, 2014. Bachelor from: http://acaai.org/resources/information/allergy-glossary (Accessed Jun, 2015).
  2. Smith West. Adverse drug reactions. Allergy? Side-effect? Intolerance? Aust Fam Phys 2013;42:12–6.
  3. Australian Gild of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA). Antibiotic allergy clinical update. ASCIA, 2014. Available from: www.allergy.org.au/wellness-professionals/hp-information/asthma-and-allergy/allergic-reactions-to-antibiotics (Accessed Jun, 2015).
  4. Bhattacharya Due south. The facts about penicillin allergy: a review. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2010;1:11–vii.
  5. Macy E. Penicillin and beta-lactam allergy: epidemiology and diagnosis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2014;14.
  6. Apter A, Schelleman H, Walker A, et al. Clinical and genetic risk factors of cocky-reported penicillin allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;122:152–8.
  7. Joint Task Force on Do Parameters, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, American Higher of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology R (Ed). Drug allergy: an updated practise parameter. Ann Allerg Asthma Immunol 2010;105:273.e1–78.
  8. DermNet NZ. Sulfa drugs and the pare. DermNet NZ, 2014. Bachelor from: www.dermnetnz.org/reactions/sulfa-drugs.html (Accessed Jun, 2015).